Showing posts with label Social Darwinism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Social Darwinism. Show all posts

Thursday, December 1, 2022

The European Press Must Immediately Say “Stop” to Fascist Propaganda

Racist policies aimed against immigrants, and particularly Muslim population, over the last 15-20 years in a number of European countries, especially Germany, Denmark, Holland, France, Italy, Belgium, Great Britain and Austria, are gaining in strength. The share of the vote of parties with fascist tendencies is growing and racist groups are enjoying secret or open support. In 2012 there are still racist-fascist parties in the parliaments of the 16 of the 27 member countries of the EU. Racist statements attract particular support at election times. Various acts of violence, that it is no exaggeration to refer to as slaughter, reveal the serious nature of the situation. For example, the fascist militant Anders Behring Breivik savagely murdered 77 people in Norway in July 2011. His trial which began in April is very significant in terms of once again revealing the persistent rise in racism in Europe.

The harm caused by the spread of fascist statements must not be ignored

Breivik’s case has been broadcast live on many European TV channels; newspapers and the radio – albeit unwittingly – abetted this fanatical killer’s anti-Muslim and anti-migrant fascist propaganda.

This monster, who constantly reiterated after the massacre that his aim was to "tell the whole world of his perverse ideology and to spread his racist ideas and to attract attention" and who wanted "his video and manifesto in which he sets out his fascist opinions to be disseminated," seems to have achieved that end. As a result of the propaganda that has been going on for almost a year, he has been awarded so-called hero status by racist fascist groups hostile to Muslims and migrants. His manifesto is on thousands of web sites, and European fascists are excitedly monitoring and spreading the killer’s pictures, words, videos and racist statements during the hearings.

The European and world press are – albeit unwillingly – abetting the propagandizing of this psychopathic killer and his perverse ideology. They have effectively become marketing agents for a criminal who murdered 77 young people in cold. They literally encourage admiration, particularly among young people who are spiritually empty and have a tendency to racist and separatist views. 

Their actions cannot be excused in terms of “freedom of opinion.” This is effectively encouraging racist fascism and this barbarity. This propaganda is effectively telling racist fascists, crazed murderers, and sadists who delight in killing tens of people, in Europe and all over the world, that "you too should do such things and kill that many people. Let us make you famous, too. You can spend 20 years in a prison like a luxurious hotel, or even avoid prison at all by pretending to be insane.” For all these reasons, the European press must immediately stop propagandizing – albeit unwillingly – for this monster who is trying to portray himself as a so-called patriotic hero.

What needs to happen to obstruct the propaganda of monsters such as Breivik is that the trial should proceed closed to the press. This killer should not be allowed to turn every hearing into a fascist circus because any word or action in those hearings on the society will inevitably be destructive. Even now on the internet many ignorant people have declared this psycho to be a hero, praised his behavior on the television and interpreted his racist salute in the hearings as a message.

The fascist propaganda going on –in the absence of any rebuttal- has already had a huge and devastating impact. The European press needs to act in a responsible manner before it is too late. It must stop acting as an instrument of this wide-ranging fascist propaganda, and must act in a determined manner, through sanctions if necessary. A look at events from the past and remembering the true face of fascism will make the urgency of this even clearer.  

Fascism is a policy of savagery that targets human values

Various methods are employed to seek to justify fascism, a bloody ideology that has wreaked great harm on humanity. Not only was it the cause of the death and torture of tens of millions of people merely because of their race, and the savagery of the Second World War in the last century, but it has also sought to destroy all human values wherever it has emerged, by contributing to a "climate of fear."

Fascism is actually the hidden ideology in many countries in the world, even if it is not actually called by that name. Fascist thinking, the cause of much conflict, civil war and slaughter, is also spreading to the "streets" in many countries, and vicious, angry communities are now emerging, who barbarically enjoy violence and bloodshed.

The education system must be changed if fascism is to be eradicated

In order to defeat fascism, it is first necessary to understand what fascism is. Fascism is a culture. At its roots are paganism, the Darwinist concept of "conflict," and Darwinian racism. In order for fascism to be done away with, these superstitions need to be torn down.

However, the methods used tend to produce the opposite of the desired effects. The Western nations which confront fascist gangs and spend millions of dollars on trying to catch, punish and destroy them, are actually all the while assisting in the spread of fascist groups, because they offer a Darwinist education to their young people. They teach them in school the lie that life is an arena of brutality, a battleground, and such Darwinist concepts as that one has to be ruthless and fight in order to survive. They also propagate the idea that man is a species of animal that evolved from an ape-like creature, and therefore, that there are "advanced" and "backward" races in this evolutionary process. It is almost inevitable that someone who has received such an education will become a fascist. With the imposition of Darwinism on large masses of people, fascism is spreading rapidly, both culturally and in an organized form. 

For that reason, there needs to be an “effective intellectual struggle against fascism” across the world.

In order to get rid of fascism, Darwinism, the so-called scientific basis of the ideology, has to be defeated and people have to instead be taught the concepts of love, affection, compassion, humility, understanding, and justice.

The only way for bloody ideologies such as fascism to be eliminated from history is through anti-Darwinist and anti-materialist education. As in the case of Breivik, the perverse teachings of Darwinism lead to bloody and ruthless consequences. If one wants to put an end to terror and bloodshed, the most effective means of doing so is to tell people of the invalidity of Darwinism and to show, with full supporting scientific evidence, that it is utterly groundless.

From Mr. Adnan Oktar's interview on April 18, 2012 on A9 TV

ADNAN OKTAR: There is no need to let him talk for two hours. Sentence him and send him away. Why prolong the matter? They are letting him engage in endless fascist propaganda. He is a psycho and an attention-seeker. He wants people to hear his message and is using the press to that end. The whole judicial process should be closed to the press. They should just sentence him and have done. It is disgraceful and wrong to make the process a wide-ranging propaganda tool and to encourage such maniacs. As if to say, if you also commit murders like that and behave like a psycho, we will make you famous, too. Nothing will happen. You can plead insanity or serve 20 years, and the prison there are really comfortable anyway, and we will make you world famous. That is the kind of logic they are developing. That is very wrong and ugly. The man is making fascist propaganda day and night, and the echoes of that last for months afterward. They must drop all that. We must warn the European press.

 

2012-05-02

Those Who Say That ''Communism Is Not A Danger Anymore'' Are Being Deceived By The Communists

Some people in our country, just like some in the world, are unaware of the things that they might be facing and are claiming that there is no longer any danger of communism in our day. They assume that communism was simply a  scourge of the 20th Century and that it had been lived through and ended in that period, and that it is no longer a threat. They are very much invested in that idea and they are neither aware of the dangers they are facing, nor able to take precautions against them.  On the contrary, by saying that there is no danger of communism, they are dragging people around them into a state of complacency and thus drag themselves into that scourge as well. With such an approach, they give way to the communist mentality to easily become stronger and find a door with which to gain entry. That is because communism gains strength and expands at times when people are lulled into complacency as they say "There is no communist threat anymore" and do not take any precautions against this scourge. 

People who say that "The danger of communism  ended in the 20th Century" are in a grave deception. Communism has never ceased to exist.  So long as Darwinism continues to exist, communism will continue to exist as well. That is because fundamentally both of these rest on a shared philosophy: Dialectic Materialism. Darwin adapted this thought to  nature and Marx adapted it to history and society. Consequently, just like in the 20th Century, Marxism continues to exist today as well and so long as Darwinism continues to exist, it would never disappear from the world  politics. 

Indeed, at the moment, the "Darwinist dictatorship" reigns in all the states, educational institutions and the press. This reign nourishes the communist thought system and the system of education continues to educate communist militants without slowing down. To say it in brief, Communism is only in ambush at the moment. 

As we have stated before, the communists attribute the unsuccessful result of Russian communism in the 20th Century to the wrong application of Marxism. Now they think that they can resuscitate the communist system without making those same mistakes. This thought is being advocated by many organizations, think-tanks and non-governmental organizations all over the world who still believe in Marxism.  Those modern communists have separated the communist regimes in the Soviet Union and the Eastern Bloc from Marxist ideology even while they still existed. They used to call the current communist regimes "real socialism", meaning practiced socialism, and claimed that the socialist ideology is not bound to these regimes and would remain a viable ideology even if those regimes collapse. 

Today they are voicing this claim even more effectively. Their claims are as follows; according to Marx, each society should go through some certain phases. They should first have feudalism, then capitalism, then socialism and then proceed to communism. However in Russia and in the other communist regimes of the 20th Century they  had a sudden transition to socialism from more-or-less feudal agricultural societies. The capitalist phase in between has been skipped. Consequently, according to the Marxists, it is natural for these regimes to be unsuccessful. Now with these countries embracing capitalism, the "capitalist phase" mentioned by Marx will be experienced and after that socialism will return more permanently and strongly. All communists, in their hiding places, have waited for this moment since capitalism started to rule the world.

“One step forward, two steps back"

The scenario we have stressed  in the previous section is Lenin's well known "one step forward, two steps back" tactic. According to this tactic, in order to reach their goals, communists take a few steps back whenever it is necessary and appear as if they have distanced themselves from their goals. However, they simply wait in ambush. This principle, that Lenin wrote a pamphlet about, is being executed at the moment.  

Lenin explained this situation with the following words: 

One step forward, two steps back. . . . It happens in the lives of individuals, and it happens in the history of nations and in the development of parties. It would be the most criminal cowardice to doubt even for a moment the inevitable and complete triumph of the principles of revolutionary Social-Democracy, of proletarian organisation and Party discipline. (Vladimir Ilyich Lenin, One Step Forward, Two Steps Back, 1904) 

As it would be understood from these words of Lenin, it is not possible for a communist to give up communism or to carry doubts which state communism would be unsuccessful eventually. At the moment, they only have taken a step back and are waiting for an appropriate moment to switch to the communist system. That appropriate moment will be the period in which capitalism has become most widespread all over the world.  Among the states that practice wild- capitalism, there will be a fight over capital, people will show an inclination to material things instead of spiritual values and thus will become remote from religion. Societies becoming irreligious would, of course, be most advantageous for the communists. The first condition necessary for the establishment of communist societies, which is to keep people far removed from religion, moral and spiritual values, would thus be ensured by the capitalist system. After this step, the duty on the communists waiting in ambush is to confiscate  capital, neutralize the bourgeois and abolish the concepts of family and state.  They believe that to realize this in an aimless society which has significantly lost its beliefs and moral values would be considerably easy. 

The things going on in the world at the moment are developing just in the way that communists want and wait for. Countries are practicing a ruthless form of capitalism in the perfect sense of the word.  The inclination to materials has genuinely caused people to keep away from spiritual and moral values and gave way to the establishment of aimless societies that are  lost and far removed from the morality of religion. At the moment, the communists in Russia are making an arrangement in their own way because of the disruption in their historical order (transition to communism from capitalism). That is the reason why they have rendered the Russian public into the hands of oligarchs, plutocrats and organized criminals  and prepared the way for a classical capitalism. Through the system they have established, they are having their people severely oppressed and thus they are trying to make them say; "There is no other solution, the only way out is communism". 

The capitalist system of life creates an effect on people that is almost similar to hypnosis. Because people in these societies are generally after making money, living in comfort and consuming, they are not aware of the dangers waiting for them in ambush. They are not in an alert state of mind. Communists are keenly aware of this. They frequently state that people fail to realize that communist way of thinking is gaining strength because they are consumed in their ambitions for goods and income and thus are constantly defeated by communism. Even though they see that they will be swallowed by the communist thinking, the vast majority becomes blind because of their greed for possessions and earthly desires, and thus they lose their defensive reflexes. That environment is the most suitable environment for communists to take action. 

Communism Covertly Continues Its Existence

As a result of the "one step forward, two steps back" strategy, communism still covertly maintains its existence. Especially in Russia, the entire leadership of the government and the bureaucracy consists of former communists. Those people who are trained with dialectic materialism have not given up their dreams about communism. On the contrary, those who believe that communism requires a passage through a capitalist stage, are remaining as guides for capitalism, in order to realize a necessity of becoming a "communist". Because they are real communists, they are practicing and advocating capitalism at the moment. 

This is the situation today not only in Russia but in the whole world. In almost every country of Europe, communist parties maintain their existence and moreover some are getting considerably high votes. In almost every country of the former Eastern Bloc, there are socialist parties managed by the former communist staffs.  Communist authors and artists silently continue their existence in a quiet corner and give covert messages that  places a communist way of thinking into the subconscious minds of the people. In fact nothing has changed. They are only waiting patiently for capitalism to prepare the proper  environment for them. Thus, they are only behaving in accordance with the recommendations of Marx. 

However, perhaps the one thing that most serves the interests of communists is the economic crisis that engulfs  the world at the moment.  Even though until recently there was a belief that economic and democratic structures can never be harmed, the  massive economic crisis plaguing  the whole world, apart from people's political tendencies, has also changed people's way of looking into life considerably, and all of a sudden.  And this is an important means of advantage for communists. As it would be remembered, this was previously experienced in history as well; as the result of the Great Depression beginning in 1929, a great economic crisis occurred in the whole world and the popularity of both communist and fascist parties in Europe increased exponentially. Communists who evaluated the Great Depression as the "collapse of the capitalist system" had thus gained the opportunity to influence the masses very easily. In their desperation, people were left obliged to accept that communism is the only way out.

Such a danger is also valid today. All the former communists waiting in ambush, the new communist groups trained by them and the communist youth are  making use of the present economic crisis. Consequently the years that we are living in right now are highly suitable for the danger of communism to once more gain an effective place in the world politics. Most of the communist parties regard the economic crisis as an opportunity to drag their countries into the communist swamp.  

2012-07-06

Syria Is A Part Of The Shanghai Bloc, The People Of Syria Resist Communism

Communism does not only prevail in the former communist countries. It is also a dominant regime in countries that possess Islamic titles, and even those ones having the name of Islamic Republic. When we look at the conflicts that have arisen in some Middle Eastern and North African countries under the name of the Arab Spring, this situation can be easily discerned.

As is known in countries like Egypt, Syria, Libya, Palestine and Iraq, the ideology of “Arab socialism” is very dominant. In these countries, the communist understanding brought by the Marxist mindset has reigned for many years. The fact is, the -communist mindset has never lost its influence despite that these countries have remained in existnece  with different appearances and under different names. States were, and still are, secretly administered in compliance with such regime. These countries are the representatives of the communist bloc led by Russia and China. In response to it, there exists the capitalist, liberal bloc led by America. For instance in Iran, one of the main representatives of the communist bloc, although there seems to be an Islamic administration, a Marxist-communist mindset prevails beneath. As one would remember, the Iranian Islamic Republic came into being by a revolution. This revolution was accomplished with the cooperation of the Tudeh, the Communist Party of Iran. The purpose was to create a communist understanding. It is also possible to understand this from this act. “Revolution” is a communist concept and the word “revolution” and Islam are incompatible concepts. Consequently, the name of the  Islamic Republic of Iran is indeed deceiving. The administration in Iran is not really an Islamic one; it is essentially a communist regime masking itself as a theocratic state.

Once the communist regime reigns, people’s speaking about Islam, their Islamic identities or its being referred as the Islamic Republic does not change anything for communists. They already implement the tenets of Darwinism, materialism and communist ideologies in these countries without facing any problems. Consequently they proceed on their way.

The Shanghai bloc which is representative of the communist bloc has embraced s many countries in the Middle East. A glance into the general policies of these countries is sufficient to grasp this fact. For instance Iran, Syria, Egypt and other countries have always been in cooperation with the communist countries of the world. Darwinism holds sway over their state administrations. In schools, Darwinism is imposed toon pupils. People are raised in a way to make them embrace the communist viewpoint. Rather than the merciful, warm, peaceful and friendly style we have been  used to from the Ottoman times, a sort of aggressive, merciless and loveless communist style prone to  shedding blood is prevalent. (The ones we have been criticizing here are those who have adopted the bloody policy of communism as a way of life and see no harm in spreading their ideologies. Our brothers, whose hearts are full of the beauties brought by the morality of Islam, who are conscientious and thus have remained desperate due to the prevailing system of persecution, are surely beyond this.)

For instance, the sole reason for the disorder that prevails currently in Syria is the imposition of communism upon pure Muslims there. Although inner conflicts have been continuously portrayed as conflicts among some Islamic schools in some certain press organs, what prevails currently in Syria is a struggle between communists and Muslims. Since the time of Hafez al-Assad, Syria has been under  Marxist-communist rule. With this aspect, Syria is the one of the leading representatives of Arab socialism.

As one would remember, the administration of Hafez al-Assad  had been enjoying very warm relations with the former Soviet Union and banned the advocation of all views other than the communist ideology embraced by the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party. All Islamic movements were restricted, Islamic leaders were arrested and martyred, and Muslims went through a time of great oppression, violence and torture. In the  1982, Hafez al-Alssad and his brother Rifad al-Assad committed an enormous massacre in the cities of Hama and Hummis, martyring some forty thousand Muslims. Today Syria led by Bashar al-Assad , the son of Hafez al-Assad, the incessant massacres going on in Syria everyday simply prove that the socialist-communist ideology prevalent in the country has not changed a bit.

The Ba'athist mindset of Hafez al-Assad is still going on in the country. Currently the Syrian administration is almost completely  under the control of Russia. Almost all the experts in Syria are Russians. The Syrian youth and officers generally receive their training in Russia or China. They speak Russian and Chinese fluently. It is possible to see Syrians in every corner of Russia, for this is a communist bloc and communist structure which has been unceasingly existing for years. The conflicts going on in Syria today are the Muslim’s struggle to remove this communist system. For the first time in its history, Syria is facing such a resolute and strong resistance against communism. Before the very eyes of the world, they see no harm in massacring their own people, for they no longer know what to do.

The dominance of the Shanghai bloc is not solely limited to the Middle East. The communist parties in Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia and Algeria have, for instance, remained  very strong. North European countries are under the direct control of  communist parties. The communist administrations are already in power in the  majority of the South American countries. Since  WWII, the administrations in countries such as China, Laotian and Vietnam have never changed.

As all these suggest, the Shanghai bloc, which is the major representative of the communist ideology, holds control over a very important part of the world.

All these facts must lead us to grasp the dimensions of the threat very well. It is evident that apart from the short-term measures, essentially long-term measures must be resorted to against the conflicts occurring in the Islamic countries which have assumed the task of being the spokesman of the Shanghai

bloc and the unrest among the Arab countries. The UN, NATO, The EU, America and the European countries’ embargoing the Syrian administration due to the ongoing conflicts and Iran, in the case of any threat, would be, as a first resort, highly dissuasive.

But of course  this is not  a definite solution that will eradicate the communist threat in those regions. The absolute solution is the removal of the communist mindset and the perverted materialist mindset, in other words, the ideology. This materialist, Darwinist and communist ideology in the minds of the people have been formed with great effort by years of education and sophisticated propaganda.  Elimination of this ideology is again possible only by education, a very serious intellectual campaign and effort. What has to be accomplished is to reveal the invalidity of Darwinism, which is the basis of communism, by means of scientific evidence and prove that the fake truths brought by the communist mindset are deprived of any scientific basis. Once this superstitious creed is eliminated from their minds , violence, massacres, hatred, and conflicts will also lose their ideological basis, the communist bloc will fade in history, and people will learn to experience love in their lives.

  

2012-07-06

The Ideological Basis of the Rwandan Genocide is Rooted in Darwin's Theory of Evolution

The theory of evolution bases the development of living things on a “struggle for survival” that exists in nature. According to the founder of the theory, Charles Darwin, there is a ruthless fight for survival and permanent conflict in nature. The strong invariably eliminate the weak, and progress is only possible in this way. 

Darwinism longs for a world in which human beings live and behave like animals. When this Darwinist law of the jungle is applied to societies, conflict and war between races and nations  are inevitable. War, killing, mass murder and barbarity in many parts of the world assumed a scientific guise, and the 20th Century was one of pain and ruthlessness.

Darwin's writings about “the protection of favored races,” and especially the unscientific claims in his book The Descent of Man, supported the German error of the superiority of the alleged Aryan race and the British idea of the superiority of the Anglo Saxons.

The  mass murder of approximately 40 million  people by the Nazis and their racially driven program of systematic genocide during the Second World War, the former apartheid system in South Africa and the racial discrimination against black people in the USA and the aboriginal peoples in Australia all drew strength from the support that Darwinism supposedly provided for racism.

How can those who say, “These ideologies are things of the past” or “There is no longer any need to tell people of the invalidity of the theory of evolution” ignore the fact that in Rwanda in 1994 some 800,000 Hutus and Tutsis died in 100 days as a result of skull-based racism?

The roots of the Rwandan genocide go back to the Belgian colonization of the country in the wake of World War I. It was claimed in those days, on the supposed scientific basis of Darwin’s theory of evolution, that the people living in the region of Rwanda were an intermediate race between the Aryan race and negroes, who were regarded as an inferior race. Skull measurements were taken, common linguistic, traditional and ethnic similarities  between the Rwandan Hutus and Tutsis were ignored and an artificial policy of racial discrimination was followed.

In order to foment racial discrimination, Belgian administrators enforced ethnic identity cards and gave everyone a card on which his or her ethnicity was written. These racially-based practices between Hutus and Tutsis from 1930 to 1994 brought the background conflict in the country to a peak. And despite a concerted last-minute UN intervention in 1994, 800,000 Rwandans lost their lives in just 100 days.

The documentary “Shake Hands With The Devil; The Journey of Romeo Dallaire”, in which the commander of the UN Peace Force during the genocide describes those events, describes how the racism in the region was supported by Darwinist circles:

“The problem that essentially was created by the Belgians, who had this country as a colony, and through their whole etnictiy, exercise, and their antropologists who had gone on a wild sphere of idiotic theories and sizes of heads and this and that, and the administrators included the ethnicity on the ID cards. And then that splits the country and identifies you as elements of difference.

“I understand the intense ethnic hatred weren’t really in the soul of Hutus and Tutsis but were encouraged by the emperial powers over the years.”

According to Social Darwinism, people’s skulls need to be measured and classifications made on that basis. Under this twisted way of thinking, members of supposed inferior classes must be ruthlessly eliminated and exploited. For these people, who believe that only when such savagery is applied can human beings and societies progress, and massacres, genocide, cruelty and ruthlessness on that path are to be regarded as successes. People, societies, cultures and nations that fail to achieve that success must be eliminated.

This is without doubt a most twisted and dangerous way of thinking. The dangers of Darwinism must not be ignored. We must not forget that Darwinism and social models based on Darwinism have inflicted the most awful tragedies on mankind. But the moral values commanded by Allah and revealed in the Qur’an will always bring with them well-being, peace and tranquility.

If the pains of the last century are finally to come to an end in the 21st Century, and if this century is to be one of peace, then an end must be put to dogmatic Darwinist education.

 

2012-08-15

The Nonsense of Evolution, Which Is Devoid of Any Scientific Validity, Is Imposed In Schools In Many Countries of The World

Darwinism occupies an official place in the curricula of schools and universities in just about every country of the world today. Scientific facts are ignored, and even distorted, and misused, in an effort to use them in favor of evolution, as this outdated theory is kept propped up for ideological reasons.

LEARNING DARWINIST FAIRY-TALES IS COMPULSORY, WHILE THE TEACHING OF THE SCIENTIFIC FACTS IS BANNED!

 The fact remains that the theory of evolution is unable to explain how the first living cell or even a single protein could have formed. Not one single transitional form fossil showing that life forms are descended from one another has ever been found from among the more than 350 million fossils discovered to date. If the myths of evolution are to be taught in schools, these facts revealed by science must also be taught. Children and young people need to be educated with the facts revealed by 21st-century science, not pagan teachings left over from Sumerian times.

Yet the Darwinist dictatorship never permits that. Evolution is taught in a compulsory manner, as part of the curriculum, in the school textbooks of just about all countries.

Nonsense such as the myth of giraffes acquiring longer necks as they stretched up to reach higher leaves, the hoax of the industrial melanism and peppered moths, the lie that human beings and monkeys are descended from a common ancestor and the fiction of primitive man living in caves is still taught to young people in Europe as if were scientific fact.

Moreover, young people in Turkic states and even Iran are also educated with these myths of evolution, not just those in European countries.

Ernst Haeckel’s fraudulent embryo drawings, the lie of the existence of fictitious half-reptile and half-bird creatures and the fairy tale of the evolution of the horse are all taught as if they were scientific truth.

Yet young people have no right to demand any supporting evidence in the face of this nonsense!

They have no right to express the facts revealed by science!

They have no right to give the answers shown by science in exams!

No student saying that “... evolution doesn't exist” in biology classes anywhere in the world has the possibility of passing that class!

People with academic careers in fields such as biology, anthropology or paleontology in any country of the world have no possibility of saying “... evolution doesn't exist” and then being promoted!

Although everyone in nearly all countries of the world are well aware that evolution is an outdated myth and an unscientific ideology, all students, teachers, academics and politicians “are forced to sign up to evolution.” People who refuse have to repeat academic years again, are deprived of the right to an education or lose their jobs, and campaigns against them appear in the press.

In short, neither students nor teachers enjoy the right even to question the theory of evolution. Though refuted in the face of scientific developments time and time again, the theory is still portrayed as an absolute truth.



Interestingly, despite this manifest situation, some people are still able to say, “Does Darwinism really exist at all?”. Yes, Darwinism has collapsed scientifically, but efforts are still being made to keep it propped up ideologically. Moreover, this is done through prohibitory, oppressive and fascist policies.

But we are now in the century when all this pressure will come to an end. The sun has now risen and the true illumination of mankind has begun. Even though Darwinists are keeping the drapes tightly drawn and saying “There is no Sun,” people have now seen the light of the truth. This is the century of truth, not of myth. Science will overcome the repressive and prohibitory Darwinist mindset, and the truth will emerge victorious.

Say: “Truth has come and falsehood has vanished. Falsehood is always bound to vanish.” (Surat al-Isra’, 81)

2012-08-21

The Persecution in Burma Stems, Not from Buddhists, but from the Darwinist Mindset

The struggle between believers and non-believers has persisted throughout the course of history. All the conflict and ideological differences in the world are based on the intellectual and ideological struggle between these two poles. Those who espouse the true religion and say, “Allah is One,” and who seek to install the fine moral values brought with them by the true faiths have always been faced by a diametrically opposed force. If there is violence and savagery somewhere this comes from these anti-forces’ intolerance of the supporters of the true faith. However, there is one very important detail that needs to be noted here.

Depicting believers as in favor of violence is a cunning ploy

These forces of opposition sometimes appear in the guise of adherents of a religion. But this is a deception. No adherent of a true faith can ever support savagery and barbarity. If someone spreads savagery, hates everything or carries out terrorist actions and killings, then he is literally irreligious. The fact it says he is Muslim, Christian or Jewish on his ID papers does not mean he is at all religious. One therefore needs to analyze events from that perspective when there is oppression, disorder or terror. Certain cunning forces are trying to have all conflicts, sufferings and acts of terror laid at the door of believers. In particular, by using certain parts of the press and various publications they spread scenarios intended to incite conflict between Muslims and Christians, Shiites and Sunnis or Jews and Muslims. The aim here is to prevent unity and union among those who believe in Allah. The forces in question are well aware that if believers are united then they will represent a major force against all false ideologies and cannot be defeated. Since they regard that union as a threat they have developed these policies of artificial hatred in order to eliminate any alliance among believers.

While believers fight among themselves, proponents of the Darwinist, communist and Marxist mindset continue to support one another, grow stronger and find the ideal environment for spreading their own perverse ideologies. The forces in question use this method in some Arab countries, the Middle East and places such as Burma.

Darwinist ideology is the cause of the instances of oppression in the world

There are countries all over the world where Muslims are a minority. Millions of Muslims are living under pressure in minorities in Burma, the Philippines, Cambodia and Thailand, and these conflicts are generally fed by strife or differences of opinion among believers.

The conflict in Syria is portrayed as one between Shiites and Sunnis, and the press always reflects that idea. But this is a deception. There is actually a struggle going on in Syria between God-fearing people and Darwinists and communists. The events taking place in Syria are a rebellion against socialist, communist ideology that has been around since the time of Hafez Assad and has never ceased to exist.

In the same way, the terrifying persecution that has been going on in Burma since the 1990s is depicted as an assault by Buddhists on Muslims. But the people perpetrating the attack there are actually part of the junta that espouses Darwinist ideology, even if they appear to be Buddhists. (Today Buddhism is a pagan religion but it is probably a corrupted form of a true faith. There is no aggression or oppression in the teachings of Buddhism that have been left over from the true faith.) It is impossible for people who resort to violence to come out for religion. If they do this in the name of religion, then they are either deceiving people, or else know nothing about religion, or else are themselves deceived. No religion permits persecution, killing, terror or genocide. No true believer can persecute anyone else, be a terrorist, or deprive others of their rights. Religion brings with it love, affection and solidarity. Advocates of true religion have always brought love to the world.

But Darwinist ideology and ideologies based on it, such as Marxism, Leninism, communism and fascism, oppress others, terrorize communities, commit terrorist actions, engage in genocide, perpetrate mass slaughter and mercilessly kill women and children, young and old. If there is terror or strife somewhere, then the presence of such perverse ideologies in the region can immediately be seen. Communist ideology that espouses the dialectics of society by adopting Darwinist ideology, which espouses the dialectics of nature, makes a precondition out of conflict. It irrationally maintains that there can be no progress without conflict. It is these perverse ideologies that poison societies with hatred.

Let us unite in order to put an end to the oppression stemming from the corruption of Darwinism

If we want an end to the strife on Earth, the sole precondition is the scientific elimination of Darwinism, the intellectual idea behind these perverse ideologies. And the way to intellectually eradicate Darwinism is to discuss and show the scientific proofs revealing the invalidity of the theory of evolution everywhere possible. Activities such as handing out books, opening exhibitions, writing articles, opening web sites, holding conferences and radio and television programs are highly important in terms of giving people this information. Indeed, the positive effects of such activities are already spreading very rapidly and people have begun to accept the fact that evolution is the worst scientific fraud of all time.

To issue one final reminder, the whole Islamic world has a responsibility to ensure that all mankind achieves peace and security. The Islamic world has an obligation to be united in order to rescue those people living in pain and suffering in East Turkestan, Burma, Pathani, Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine and many other places, and to bring about a permanent solution. A Turkish-Islamic world that is united and acts as brothers in a spirit of solidarity will never face any such problems. It will guarantee that not just Muslims, but also Christians, Jews, Buddhists and even the irreligious and atheist can live in security, wealth, peace and joy. 

2012-08-29

Wednesday, November 30, 2022

The Role Of The Theory of Evolution in School Attacks

A large number of students in schools have been killed in attacks using weapons on schools in Europe and the USA in recent years. The media have generally suggested that these attacks are the work of people with depression or psychopathic behavior (antisocial personality disorder). Looked at closely, however, there is another more striking factor behind these attacks; the theory of evolution which claims that life is a struggle between weak and strong.

Thirteen people were murdered in the attack by Columbine High School final year students Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, who then killed themselves, in the U.S. state of Colorado on 20 April, 1999. One newspaper report described the reason for the massacre as follows; “It has emerged that Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, who killed 13 fellow-students in the attack on Columbine High School, were influenced by Darwin's theory of ‘natural selection’.” [1]

During the attack, Eric Harris wore a T shirt that made the origin of the violence he perpetrated perfectly clear. The T shirt read “natural selection.” In video recordings, the pair stated that they were influenced by the ideas of natural selection and the elimination of the weak in natural selection. Darrell Scott, who lost his 13-year-old daughter Rachel in the attack and only saved his son Craig with difficulty, said that he could not understand why the motivation of the killers was completely ignored:

“Harris wore a ‘Natural Selection’ T-shirt on the day of the killings. They made remarks on video about helping out the process of natural selection by eliminating the weakThey also professed that they had evolved to a higher level than their classmates.” [2]

Harris was so firmly convinced a Darwinist as to say that inoculating human beings and plants was an interference in nature’s process of eliminating weeds. He even said there should be no warnings on dangerous goods; “let natural selection take its course. All the fat, ugly, retarded, crippled dumbass, stupid … in the world would die … Maybe then the human race can actually be proud of itself.” [3] he said.

Barry Arrington, lawyer for a family who lost six children at Columbine, described how devoted to Darwinism Eric Harris was:

“I read through every single page of Eric Harris’s journals; I listened to all of the audio tapes and watched the videotapes … It became evident to me that Harris consciously saw his actions as logically arising from what he had learnt about evolution. Darwinism served as his personal intellectual rationale for what he did. There cannot be the slightest doubt that Harris was a worshipper of Darwin and saw himself as acting on Darwinian principles.” [4]

On the web site “Psikiyatri ve Hayat,” expert psychiatrist Dr. Kubilay Boğoçlu considered the details of the attack at Columbine High School and psychological analyses of the perpetrators. Boğoçlu emphasized on the site that the attackers’ first victim was specially selected. This was female student Rachel Scott. Rachel’s father was a clergyman and Rachel had been raised within the Christian culture. The name of one performance she put on at school was Watch the Lamb, for instance. Klebold knew about that project since her personally helped Rachel during the preparations. In other words, the first victim was the daughter of a clergyman and had put on a performance about the need to protect the weak. [5]

Harris and Klebold, on the other hand, regarded themselves as strong and superior people who had to eliminate the weak. In a video recording during which he described natural selection by the elimination of the weak, Harris claimed that they had evolved to a higher level than their classmates. [6]

Harris expressed his Darwinist attitudes in this way on his website:

“...im comin for EVERYONE soon, and i WILL be armed to the … teeth and i WILL shoot to KILL and i WILL … KILL EVERYTHING!... I am the law, if you don’t like it, you die. If I don’t like you or I don’t like what you want me to do, you die... So thats the only way to solve arguments with all you … out there, I just kill!” [7]

It is a fact that ideas within the theory of evolution that encourage aggression and moral degeneration, such as life being a battlefield and the use of physical force to prevail over others is a law of nature, incite the immoral tendencies and acts of violence that have been seen in schools in recent times are regarded as normal.

Killers regard themselves as a pioneer force in the battle for survival.

According to their twisted perspective, if conflict prevails in nature, then it is as normal for people to kill those they regard as weak as it for a lion to kill an antelope. If the lion is not held to account for killing the antelope, neither should they be held to account. Because, like the lion, they are also acting in the light of the natural selection in Darwin’s teaching. Indeed, it emerged at while the attack on a school in Pennsylvania in 2007 was being prepared, one of the students frequently visited a web site called Natural Selection's Army,” and this perverse logic has been shown to be a significant factor in such attacks.[8]  Moreover, visitors to that site also took part in chat rooms known as “cyber school for killers.” These sites were immediately closed down by the service providers once the police became aware of them. However, many teenagers still continue to play a computer game in which the opposing sides seek to annihilate one another. The name of this popular game is “Natural Selection.” This shows that this term is associated by many young people with sudden and extreme violence. This game, which stars Harris and Klebold, also features original images of the Columbine massacre. [9]

According to information given to the press, one of those who frequently visited the Natural Selection’s Army web site was the 18-year-old Finnish student Pekka-Eric Auvinen. On 7 November, 2007, killed 6 students and 2 officials, and then himself, in an armed attack on the Jokela High School in the town of Tuusula.

One newspaper reported headed “I Was Inspired by the Theory,” described the reason behind Auvinen’s massacre:

“The 18-year-old armed student Pekka Eric Auvinen who attacked a school in Finland on 7 November, 2007, shot his teacher after forcing him to kneel down first. It also emerged that Auvinen, who also shot 8 of his friends, was a regular visitor to the "Natural Selection’s Army" web site inspired by Darwin’s theory of evolution. Auvinen later admitted that he was inspired to perpetrate the massacre by Darwin’s theory.” [10]

Pekka Eric Auvinen posted a apologia on the internet before carrying out the killings. In that apologia, Auvinen described himself as a “Social Darwinist” and said that natural selection no longer worked and had even gone into reverse. He spoke of stupid, weak-minded people reproducing faster than intelligent, strong-minded ones. He was sure that if society continued to ensure the survival of the former, then the gene pool would be deteriorated. He worried over what to do about the problem. He finally concluded that life consisted merely of meaningless coincidences and lengthy, random mutations, and that trying to do anything is meaningless. But eventually he had decided he would do his bit by becoming a natural selector, aping the pitiless indifference of nature.” [11]

Auvinen set out the pretext for his reaching that decision:

“No mercy for the scum of the Earth! Humanity is overrated. It’s time to put natural selection and survival of the fittest back on track.” [12]

The 18-year-old Auvinen broadcast a number of video clips under different user names on various web sites. These consisted of images of violence accompanied by pessimistic and aggressive songs. Nobody should be surprised that someone who perpetrated such a bloody massacre should have had violent tendencies. However, one of these video clips was particularly striking in times of shedding light on the background to the attack. In a clip titled “My Philosophy” on one web site under the user name of I'm Gonna Kill You All 667, Auvinan stated he would commit the killing as a requirement of natural selection.

Natural selection is a concept on which Charles Darwin based his theory fo evolution and expresses the idea that in the supposed struggle for survival, the strong should eliminate the weak. Natural selection is a concept based on absolutely no scientific findings. Since it was based on violence and described human beings as the result of blind natural events, it became the indispensible foundation for both atheist philosophies and for ideologies and movements that favored violence. The dictators who sent millions to their deaths in the Second World War also regarded conflict as a part of natural selection and made a great many references to Darwinism in their propaganda.

We again come across "natural selection" in the Jokela High School massacre. Auvinen called for the application of natural selection in the video in which he set out his “philosophy.” Posing in a T shirt reading “Mankind Is Unimportant,” Auvinen said this about the value that Darwinism attached – or rather does not attach – to man:

"I am just a normal anarchist that believes in natural selection. Humans need to put natural selection back on tracks. The animals live that way, why won't the humans. We are animals after all. We  pollute the Earth that birthed us. Humans are the worst animals on the planet. We humans came up with a screwed up society. The whole world is screwed. All of the society shall fall. That [natural selection] is what should happen. The sooner, the better... Law is the opinion of the "higher in power" ...That's why you should take control of your own life. Live in anarchy. Do what you want and don't let others tell you what to do. This is your own life.

The weak should die while the strong live. Itis survival of the fittest, natural selection. Animals die all the time. You don't see some dog crying their eyes out after they figure out that some other dog died. because another dog has died. Humans die too. It should be the same reaction. It is just all natural, not a big deal. Do not cry for someone you don't know, this is not sad... My personal phylosophy, THE GENOCIDE OF THE HUMAN RACE MUST HAPPEN." (Capital letters and spelling errors in original text) [13]

In the manifesto in which he set out his views, Auvinen explicitly stated that his Darwinist opinions influenced his perpetration of the killing:

"I am prepared to fight and die for my cause … I, as a natural selector, will eliminate all who I see unfit, disgraces of human race and failures of natural selection. No, the fact is that I am merely an animal, a human being and a dissident…The time has come to set the principle of the survival of the fittest and natural selection back on its feet. [14]

The Effects of One-Sided Darwinist Education

By spreading the lie that there is no purpose to human life, Darwinist education turns people into psychologically sick individuals, pessimistic and psychopathic, devoid of all hope and joy.

One of the latest examples of this is the Norwegian Anders Behring Breivik. Breivik admitted to perpetrating twin terror attacks in Norway on 22 July, 2011. One of these was a bomb attack on the government building in Oslo in which 8 people died. The other was an attack on a Labor party youth camp on the island of Utoya. Sixty-nine people lost their lives in that attack.

Before the attacks, Breivik set out his views in his ”European Independence Manifesto.” On page 1518 he stated that he regarded himself as a champion of the scientific world view and modern biology. Among the books he “most valued” was Charles Darwin's Origin of Species. [16] According to Breivik, "a perfect Europe" must include the laws of social Darwinism[17]

On page 1202 of his book, Breivik says that he entirely agrees with  the Darwinist biologist from Princeton University Lee Silver regarding the re-implementation of eugenics. He agrees with Silver’s view that radical policies will have to be applied in the future if the world population is to be reduced to less than half of the current figure, or 3.8 billion. [18]  On the same page, Breivik makes it clear that he has signed up to Darwin's argument that "genocide and natural selection … go hand in hand ":

“Even if the second and third world countries ignores the call of this ”hegemony” [to stop having babies], nature will correct their suicidal tendencies as they are unable to feed their populations.” [19]

Breivik the goes on to say that there must be no intervention in this natural process, or famine:

“If starvation threatens the countries who have failed to follow our [population capacity] guidelines we should not support them by backing their corrupt leaders or send any form of aid.” [20]

“Food aid to 3rd world countries must stop immediately as it is the primary cause of overpopulation.” [21]

These words written by Breivik in person clearly show that he had lost all moral values because of his Darwinist education, as a result of which he cold-bloodedly perpetrated his terrorist  attacks that cost the lives of dozens of people.

Another example of the moral collapse and savagery caused by Darwinist education is the American serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer, who killed and ate 17 children before he was caught. In a last interview with the Dateline NBC channel immediately before he was put to death, Dahmer made the following statement:

“If a person doesn’t think that there is a God to be accountable to, then what’s the point of trying to modify your behavior to keep it within acceptable ranges? That’s how I thought anyway. I always believed the theory of evolution as truth, that we all just came from the slime [by chance]. When we died, you know, that was it, there was nothing. [22]

Darwin’s superstition that has poisoned vast numbers, turns people into serial killers and even makes them psychopathic enough to eat human flesh. That is what comes of this false religion that seeks to indoctrinate people with the idea they have no responsibility to a Creator, that convinces them they are purposeless, irresponsible and aimless entities, that regards human beings as animals and that seeks to turn people away from the fact of the hereafter by portraying death as the end.

Darwinism is the worst perverse force that has caused war, killing, oppression, terror, mass slaughter, degeneration and afflictions of all kinds for the last 200 years. DARWINISM WAS THE WORST DECEPTION AND SCOURGE OF THE LAST CENTURY, and was behind the world wars and the communism and fascism that led to irreligion, racism and mass slaughter in societies at one time.

The unfortunate effects on society of this dark scourge initiated by Darwin have persisted down to the present day. The latest book by Richard Dawkins, one of the most committed devotees of Darwinism today, contains suggestions far removed from belief in Allah that will inevitably lead to pessimism and despair. One of the most significant instances of this was the way that  Jesse Kilgore, a 22-year-old student in America, committed suicide under the effect of Dawkins’ book he was recommended by a teacher. [23]

The effect of Dawkins’ terrifying views based on the sinister ideology of Darwinism are by no means limited to that example. In the foreword to his book Unweaving the Rainbow, Dawkins himself admits that fact:

“A foreign publisher of my first book confessed that he could not sleep for three nights after reading it, so troubled was he by what he saw as its cold, bleak message. Others have asked me how I can bear to get up in the mornings. A teacher from a distant country wrote me reproachfully that a pupil had come to him in tears after reading the same book, because it had persuaded her that life was empty and purposeless. He advised her not to show the book to any of her friends, for fear of contaminating them with the same nihilistic pessimism.” [24]

This sinister scourge, Darwinism, is a perverse religion that inflicts death, murder, despair, lack of feeling, terror and savagery and encourages people to think they are nothing more than animals that came into being by chance. The few remaining representatives of that faith are still striving with all their might to turn people away from belief in Allah. That is why they strenuously oppose the teaching of the weaknesses of Darwinism in schools, hide away fossils that prove Creation, and never admit that protein cannot come into being by chance and that more than 350 million fossils totally refute Darwinism. Yet despite all these measures, people in the 21st century are no longer taken in by lies. All the efforts made to keep Darwinism propped up after it was exposed as a fraud have been in vain.

Conclusion:

Bearing in Mind These Destructive Effects of Darwinism on Society There Must Be an End to One-Sided Darwinist Education in Schools

Of course we need to concentrate on the psychologies of the aggressors responsible for the Jokela, Columbine and Virginia Tech University massacres and the personal factors that led them to commit them. However, the basic factor behind all these events is the Darwinist education persisting in schools. As we all know, students are taught that life began spontaneously and that human beings are a species of ape that  supposedly emerged through natural selection, as if these were scientific facts. Those responsible for the Jokela, Columbine and Virginia Tech attacks also received this pro-Darwinist instruction.

Darwinism is taught as if it were a scientific reality in school curricula, and it is forbidden for the opposite view, that the universe and human beings were created by Allah in the light of a valuable purpose, to be taught. In other words, Darwinism has been launched as a supposed scientific fact, in a totally biased manner. Yet Darwinism is actually a groundless theory that has totally collapsed in the face of 350 million fossils that show that living things have never changed. When we look a bit deeper, we see that Darwinism, which claims that life emerged from inanimate matter, is even incapable of explaining how its own theory might work. It is a know fact that Darwinists, trapped on the ropes in many areas, have resorted to frauds and hoaxes, such as the "Piltdown Man scandal,” in which they attached the jaw bone of an orangutan to a human skull.

There are thousands of dilemmas facing Darwinists of the type outlined in brief above, and the number is increasing all the time as scientific advances are made. Yet students exposed to biased education from very early ages in schools think that the teachings of Darwinism, that lead to savagery, are actually true, and that leads to the most terrible consequences. As well as stories of mass killings in the news, Darwinism can also be seen many cases of suicide and moral degeneration.

What needs to be done right away is to put an end to the one-sided indoctrination of Darwinism and for the scientific facts that refute Darwinism to be included in the curriculum.

Those who shape educational policies must know that Darwinist education can lead to such consequences, and must feel the responsibility that goes with. The curriculum must be shaped accordingly. And young people must be made aware of the scientific collapse of Darwinism and its ideological background.

 

[1] Habertürk, 09.11.2009

[2] http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/014745.html

[3] http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/014745.html

[4] http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/014745.html

[5] http://www.psikiyatrivehayat.com/columbinelisesikatliami.htm

[6] http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/014745.html

[8] Habertürk, 09.11.2009

[10] Habertürk Gazetesi, 09.11.2009

[13] Pekka-Eric Auvinen's Video My Philosophy

[14] http://www.reuters.com/article/2007/11/07/us-finland-shooting-idUSHEL00597220071107

[16] http://www.darwinthenandnow.com/2011/07/breivik-a-darwinist/?cb=09394448816310614

[17] Anders Behring Breivik, A European Declaration of Independence, p.1386

[18] http://www.darwinthenandnow.com/2011/07/breivik-a-darwinist/?cb=09394448816310614

[19] Anders Behring Breivik, A European Declaration of Independence, p.1202

[20] Anders Behring Breivik, A European Declaration of Independence, p.1202

[21] Anders Behring Breivik, A European Declaration of Independence, p.1203

[22] Kelly J. Coghlan, Houston Chronicle Sunday-15 February 2009

[23] http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=81459

[24] Richard Dawkins, Unweaving The Rainbow, New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1998, p. ix.

 

2013-02-27